{"id":619,"date":"2020-06-11T10:59:52","date_gmt":"2020-06-11T10:59:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beta.research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/?p=619"},"modified":"2020-06-11T10:59:52","modified_gmt":"2020-06-11T10:59:52","slug":"optical-crosstalk-and-off-axis-modeling-of-an-intrinsic-coincident-polarimeter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/2020\/06\/11\/optical-crosstalk-and-off-axis-modeling-of-an-intrinsic-coincident-polarimeter\/","title":{"rendered":"Optical crosstalk and   off-axis modeling of an   intrinsic coincident polarimeter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Polarimeters have broad applications in remote sensing, astronomy, and biomedical imaging to measure the emitted, reflected, or transmitted state of polarization. An intrinsic coincident (IC) full-Stokes polarimeter was previously demonstrated by our group, in a free space configuration, by using stain-aligned polymer-based organic photovoltaics. To minimize the model\u2019s complexity, these were tilted to avoid crosstalk from back-reflections. We present a theoretical model of a monolithic IC polarimeter that considers the back-reflection\u2019s influence for on-axis light. The model was validated using a monolithic four-detector polarimeter, which achieved an error of less than 3%. Additionally, an off-axis model was produced and validated for a simpler two detector polarimeter, demonstrating an error between the TM and TE polarized components of less than 3% for angles spanning an 18\u00b0 incidence cone.<\/p>\n<div class=\"csl-bib-body\">\n<div class=\"csl-entry\">\n<div class=\"csl-right-inline\">R. Yang, P. Sen, B. T. O\u2019Connor, and M. W. Kudenov, &#8220;Optical crosstalk and off-axis modeling of an intrinsic coincident polarimeter,&#8221; Appl. Opt., AO <b>59<\/b>(1), 156\u2013164 (2020).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: Polarimeters have broad applications in remote sensing, astronomy, and biomedical imaging to measure the emitted, reflected, or transmitted state of polarization. An intrinsic coincident&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":103,"featured_media":620,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research-papers"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/103"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=619"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":621,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619\/revisions\/621"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.ece.ncsu.edu\/osl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}